Human–Mouse Gene Identification by Comparative Evidence Integration and Evolutionary Analysis

Table 2.

Evaluation of Prediction Performance




Number of exons IMOG/BI

Correct exons IMOG/BI

Approx. exons IMOG/BI

bSN IMOG/BI

bSP IMOG/BI

eSN IMOG/BI

eSP IMOG/BI

ME IMOG/BI

WE IMOG/BI
AN 70/86
GS + TS 71/102 61/34 62/60 0.97/0.95 0.98/0.84 0.85/0.38 0.84/0.30 0.03/0.07 0.05/0.20
GS 68/92 59/42 60/75 0.97/0.97 0.94/0.69 0.71/0.46 0.74/0.30 0.03/0.04 0.04/0.25
TWS 49/79 31/36 34/57 0.79/0.73 0.85/0.82 0.62/0.40 0.63/0.37 0.25/0.31 0.04/0.19
SLM
63/77
52/35
55/69
0.89/0.88
0.97/0.87
0.81/0.39
0.82/0.36
0.08/0.10
0.01/0.11
  • Comparison of our prediction system (GS + TS) with GENSCAN (GS), TWINSCAN (TWS), and SLAM (SLM) on the IMOG and BI data set of SGP2 data set. Performance is estimated on each sequence and averaged over all sequences in the corresponding data set.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 13: 1190-1202

Preprint Server