Human–Mouse Gene Identification by Comparative Evidence Integration and Evolutionary Analysis

Table 1.

Prediction Performance With Different Pieces of Evidence




Number of exons

Correct exons

Approx. exons

bSN

bSP

eSN

eSP

ME

WE
AN 386
GS 417 272 286 0.96 0.91 0.63 0.61 0.03 0.08
AS 838 95 137 0.87 0.66 0.17 0.10 0.04 0.47
TS 375 58 72 0.92 0.75 0.19 0.18 0.09 0.17
BS 185 32 42 0.45 0.68 0.16 0.18 0.51 0.34
GS + AS 446 284 311 0.98 0.92 0.71 0.66 0.02 0.12
GS + TS 413 282 306 0.98 0.94 0.70 0.68 0.03 0.08
GS + TPS 417 278 304 0.98 0.94 0.70 0.67 0.03 0.10
GS + BS 429 278 304 0.98 0.92 0.69 0.66 0.03 0.11
GS + TS + BS
415
281
306
0.98
0.95
0.70
0.68
0.03
0.08
  • Performance comparison of gene identification with GS(GENSCAN), AS (base score), TS (phase-independent TBLASTX score), BS (BLASTX score), GS + AS (GENSCAN and base score), GS + TS (GENSCAN and phase-independent TBLASTX score), GS + TPS (GENSCAN and phase-dependent TBLASTX score), GS + BS (GENSCAN and BLASTX score), and GS + TS + BS (GENSCAN and phase-independent TBLASTX score and BLASTX score). The performance is evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation. The model is trained on all but one sequence and then evaluated on the remaining sequence. Performance is finally averaged over all such possible partitions. (AN) Annotation. (Correct exons) Predicted exons whose both boundaries are correctly predicted. (Approx exons) Predicted exons with both boundaries close to the boundaries of annotated exons (<10 nts). (bSN) base sensitivity, (bSP) base specificity, (eSN) exon sensitivity, (eSP) exon specificity, (ME) missing exons, and (WE) wrong exons are estimated following Burset and Guigo (1996).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 13: 1190-1202

Preprint Server