Genome Size Evolution in Pufferfish: A Comparative Analysis of Diodontid and Tetraodontid Pufferfish Genomes

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Cot curves for a tetraodontid (smooth) puffer, Fugu rubripes, and a diodontid (spiny) puffer, Diodon hystrix. Filled circles indicate F. rubripes data points, and open circles representD. hystrix data points. Open arrows mark the Cot1/2values of the D. hystrix repetitive (left) and single-copy (right) classes, at which half of those components are estimated to have renatured. The filled arrow indicates the Cot1/2 value of the single-copy component of the F. rubripes genome. The Cot1/2 value of the F. rubripes repetitive component is estimated to be −3.3, and does not appear on this graph.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 13: 821-830

Preprint Server