Conditionally Amplifiable BACs: Switching From Single-Copy to High-Copy Vectors and Genomic Clones

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.Figure 5.Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Effects of L-arabinose, D-glucose, and D-fucose on the amplification of the pBAC/oriV with a 20-kb insert. (A) Induction by L-arabinose (A). Strain JW378 (pBAC/oriV + 20-kb insert) was grown in LB medium (LB) supplemented with various concentrations of A. Induction, DNA extraction, and digestion were performed as described in Methods and in the legend to Figure 4A (lanes 46). (Lane 1) No inducer present in LB; (lanes25) LB + 0.01% A. (Lane 2) An undiluted DNA sample was run; (lanes 35) DNA samples were diluted 5-, 10-, or 20-fold, respectively, prior to the SalI digestion; (lanes 69) LB supplemented with 0.001%, 0.0002%, 0.00015%, or 0.0001% A, respectively. By comparing the DNA bands in lanes 1 and 5, we estimate that DNA amplification was ∼80-fold. (B) Inhibition of amplification by D-glucose (G). Strain, experimental design, and abbreviations are as in description of A. (Lane 1) No A added, LB + 0.2% G; (lanes 28) LB was supplemented with 0.01% A and with 0.2, 0.18, 0.16, 0.14, 0.12, 0.1, or 0.05% G, respectively; (lane 9) LB supplemented only with 0.01% A. (C) Inhibition of amplification by D-fucose (F). Strain, experimental panel design, and abbreviations are as in description ofA. (Lane 1) LB + 0.2% G only; (lanes 2–7) LB + 0.01% A, supplemented with none, 0.0001%, 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, or 0.5% F, respectively.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 12: 1434-1444

Preprint Server