rVista for Comparative Sequence-Based Discovery of Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites

Table 1.

Localization of Functionally Characterized Binding Sites to Conserved Blocks

Location Ref Element sequence NFAT (%ID) AP-1 (%ID)
IL-2 E1 280 (15) AGGAAAATTTGTTTCATA 90.48 90.48
E2 160 (15) AGAAATTCCAGAGAGTCA 90.48 95.24
E3 135 (15) AGGAAAAACAAAGGTAAT 95.24 80.95
E4 90 (15) TTGAAAATATGTGTAATA 95.25 100
E5 45 (15) TGGAAAAAT 95.25 n/a
IL-3 E6 306 (11) TGAGCTGAGTCAGGCTTCCCCTT 76.2 71.43
IL-4 P0 −106 (1, 2) GTAAACTCATTTTCCCTTGGTTTC 95.25 100
P1 −121 (1, 2) GTAATAAAATTTTCCAATGTAAAC 95.25 100
P2 −124 (1, 2) ACAGGTAAATTTTCCTGTGAAATC 95.25 100
P3 −238 (1, 2, 3) GGTGTTTCATTTTCCAATTTGTCT 95.25 95.24
P4 −287 (1, 2) TATGGTGTAATTTCCTATGCTTGA 100 100
P5 −406 (16) GCAGTCCTCCTGGGGAAAGATAGAGTAATATCA 95.25 95.24
IL-5 E7 163 (4, 6, 7) GCATTGGAAACATTTAGTTTCACGAT 80.95 80.95
E8 104 (4, 5) GAAATTATTCATTTCCTCAAAG 90.48 95.24
IL-13 E9 135 (12) CTGGATTTTCCA 85.71 n/a
E10 154 (13) CATGAGAAATCAAATCTTTCCTTTA 90.48 80.95
GMCSF E11 −67 (9, 10) CACCATTAATCATTTCCTCTG 80.95 100
E12 −101 (14) AGGAGATTCCACAGTTCAGGTAGTTCCCCCGCCTCC 95.1 90.48
E13 −163 (13) CCTAGGGAAAAGGCTCACCGT 80.95 90.48
E14 −2.8kb (8) GCCCTGATGTCATCTTTCCATGA 90.48 90.48
E15 −2.9kb (8) CCATCGGAGCCCCTGAGTCAGCAT 85.71 85.71
GATA-3 (%ID) Distance (bp)
IL-4 E16 −87 (17) ATTACACCAGATTGTCAGTTA- 95.25 20
TTCTGGGCCAATCAGCACC 100
IL-5 E17 −75 (18) CTCTATCTGATTGTTA 95.24 5
95.24
  • This table represents a collection of functionally characterized NFAT, AP-1, and GATA-3 binding sites. Element position is indicated in reference to the beginning of the 5′UTR of the gene. AP-1 and NFAT binding sites were independently identified using TRANSFAC (0.75/0.8) and compared with the published sequences. Distance between adjacent GATA-3 sites was measured between beginning positions of the cores. Base pairs (bp).

  • TFBS below default parameters. Percent identity (%ID) for each aligned TFBS (21 bp) was determined by rVISTA (n/a) not applicable. (1) Szabo et al. (1993); (2) Takemoto et al. (1997); (3) Li-Weber et al. (1994); (4) Lee et al. (1995); (5) Thomas et al. (1999); (6) Prieschl et al. (1995); (7) Stranick et al. (1997); (8)Cockerill et al. (1995); (9) Jenkins et al. (1995); (10) Masuda et al. (1993); (11) Gottshalk et al. (1993); (12) De Boer et al. (1999); (13)Kel et al. (1999); (14) Cakouros et al. (2001); (15) Rooney et al. (1995); (16) Burke et al. (2000); (17) Zheng and Flavell (1997); (18)Lee et al. (1998).

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 12: 832-839

Preprint Server