Analyses of the Extent of Shared Synteny and Conserved Gene Orders between the Genome of Fugu rubripes and Human 20q
- Sarah F. Smith1,5,
- Philip Snell1,
- Frank Gruetzner2,
- Anthony J. Bench3,
- Thomas Haaf2,
- Judith A. Metcalfe4,
- Anthony R. Green3, and
- Greg Elgar1
- 1Fugu Genomics, United Kingdom Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton Hall, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SB, United Kingdom; 2Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany; 3University of Cambridge, Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, United Kingdom; 4Department of Biological Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Cosmid and BAC contig maps have been constructed across twoFugu genomic regions containing the orthologs of human genes mapping to human chromosome 20q. Contig gene contents have been assessed by sample sequencing and comparative database analyses. Contigs are centered around two Fugu topoisomerase1 (top1) genes that were initially identified by sequence similarity to humanTOP1 (20q12). Two other genes (SNAI1 andKRML) mapping to human chromosome 20 are also duplicated inFugu. The two contigs have been mapped to separateFugu chromosomes. Our data indicate that these linkage groups result from the duplication of an ancestral chromosome segment containing at least 40 genes that now map to the long arm of human chromosome 20. Although there is considerable conservation of synteny, gene orders are not well conserved between Fugu and human, with only very short sections of two to three adjacent genes being maintained in both organisms. Comparative analyses have allowed this duplication event to be dated before the separation of Fuguand zebrafish. Our data (which are best explained by regional duplication, followed by substantial gene loss) support the hypothesis that there have been a large number of gene and regional duplications (and corresponding gene loss) in the fish lineage, possibly resulting from a single whole genome duplication event.
[Reagents, samples, and unpublished information freely provided by D. Barnes and I.D. Hickson.]
Footnotes
-
↵5 Corresponding author.
-
E-MAIL sfsmith{at}hgmp.mrc.ac.uk, FAX (44)1223-494512.
-
Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.221802. Article published online before print in April 2002.
-
- Received October 30, 2001.
- Accepted March 6, 2002.
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press











