Table 3.
Searching Promoters for Genes with Known 3′ ESTs
| Programs | Training set of 118 promoters | Test set of 120 promoters | ||||
| true prediction (sensitivity) | false prediction (FP/All P) | undetected | true prediction (sensitivity) | false prediction (FP/All P) | undetected | |
| PROSCAN1.7 | 15 (13%) | 17 (53%) | 99 | 12 (10%) | 21 (64%) | 97 |
| NNPP2.0 | 33 (28%) | 43 (57%) | 56 | 20 (17%) | 67 (77%) | 45 |
| PromFD1.0 | 38 (32%) | 33 (46%) | 78 | 36 (30%) | 61 (63%) | 62 |
| promoter2.0 | 6 (5%) | 99 (94%) | 13 | 7 (6%) | 104 (94%) | 9 |
| TSSG | 39 (33%) | 11 (22%) | 68 | 32 (27%) | 30 (48%) | 58 |
| TSSW | 32 (27%) | 19 (37%) | 67 | 27 (23%) | 31 (53%) | 62 |
| CONPRO | 45 (38%) | 6 (12%) | 67 | 44 (37%) | 8 (15%) | 68 |
-
CONPRO predicts promoters for about 37% human genes. Of all the predictions made by CONPRO, about 85% are correct. Additional information is given in the legend of Table 1.
