Table 3.
BLAST vs. FISH for BACs with Interchromosomal Duplications: Multiple Thresholds for a Postive BLASTSignal
| Statistic | Minimum sum of bases for positive chromosome | |||||||
| 2500 | 5000 | 10000 | 20000 | 40000 | ||||
| Minimum percent identity for BLASTHSPs | 90% | BLAST chr number | 240 | 201 | 148 | 104 | 53 | |
| % BLAST chr over FISH chr | 107% | 90% | 66% | 46% | 24% | |||
| % FISH chr identified byBLAST | 58% | 53% | 44% | 34% | 17% | |||
| % BLAST chr confirmed by FISH | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.68 | |||
| 94% | Sum ofBLASTNUM | 216 | 183 | 140 | 92 | 52 | ||
| %BLAST chr over FISH chr | 96% | 82% | 63% | 41% | 23% | |||
| % FISH chr identified byBLAST | 54% | 50% | 43% | 30% | 17% | |||
| % BLAST chr confirmed by FISH | 49% | 53% | 60% | 65% | 69% | |||
| 96% | BLASTchr number | 166 | 152 | 118 | 81 | 47 | ||
| %BLAST chr over FISH chr | 74% | 68% | 53% | 36% | 21% | |||
| % FISH chr identified byBLAST | 46% | 43% | 38% | 26% | 16% | |||
| % BLAST chr confirmed by FISH | 54% | 55% | 63% | 64% | 68% | |||
| 98% | BLASTchr number | 119 | 105 | 78 | 53 | 36 | ||
| %BLAST chr over FISH chr | 53% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 16% | |||
| % FISH chr identified byBLAST | 36% | 33% | 25% | 19% | 13% | |||
| % BLAST chr confirmed by FISH | 62% | 65% | 69% | 75% | 75% | |||
| 99% | BLASTchr number | 70 | 57 | 46 | 39 | 32 | ||
| %BLAST chr over FISH chr | 31% | 25% | 21% | 17% | 14% | |||
| % FISH chr identified byBLAST | 22% | 19% | 16% | 14% | 12% | |||
| % BLAST chr confirmed by FISH | 63% | 68% | 72% | 77% | 81% | |||











