Table 4.
Summary of Brassica–Brassica andBrassica–Arabidopsis Correspondence
| Chr. | No. of loci | Brassica | Arabidopsis | ||||
| no. of corresponding loci | no. of probes with corresponding loci (avg/probe) | no. (%) of corresponding loci in model | no. (%) of corresponding loci | no. of probes with corresponding loci (avg/probe) | no. (%) of corresponding loci in model | ||
| 1 | 101 | 86 | 57 (1.51) | 34 (40%) | 55 | 47 (1.17) | 26 (47%) |
| 2 | 30 | 29 | 19 (1.53) | 16 (55%) | 13 | 13 (1.00) | 7 (54%) |
| 3 | 26 | 27 | 20 (1.35) | 12 (44%) | 13 | 12 (1.08) | 9 (69%) |
| 4 | 58 | 54 | 34 (1.59) | 21 (40%) | 30 | 25 (1.20) | 13 (43%) |
| 5 | 33 | 24 | 16 (1.50) | 8 (32%) | 15 | 14 (1.07) | 11 (73%) |
| 6 | 29 | 35 | 22 (1.59) | 15 (44%) | 14 | 11 (1.27) | 8 (57%) |
| 7 | 28 | 19 | 15 (1.27) | 8 (42%) | 15 | 13 (1.15) | 5 (33%) |
| 8 | 20 | 23 | 17 (1.35) | 7 (30%) | 10 | 10 (1.00) | 8 (80%) |
| 9 | 42 | 41 | 25 (1.64) | 19 (46%) | 21 | 21 (1.00) | 17 (81%) |
| Total | 367 | 338 | 225 (1.50) | 140 (41%) | 186 | 166 (1.12) | 106 (57%) |
