A Radiation Hybrid Map of the Cat Genome: Implications for Comparative Mapping

Table 2.

Comparative Mapping Statistics for Observed Cat–Human Homologies

Cat Human
paint RH paint RH
CSU CSU CSO CSU CSU CSO
A1 2 5 (4) 10 (6) Hsa1 2 5 (3) 7 (6)
A2 3 7 (4) 9 (4) Hsa2 4 2 9 (6)
A3 2 2 7 (5) Hsa3 4 6 (4) 8 (3)
B1 3 3 (2) 5 (4) Hsa4 1 4 (2) 4 (2)
B2 1 2 (1) 4 (3) Hsa5 1 1 6 (5)
B3 2 6 (4) 7 (5) Hsa6 1 1 4
B4 2 5 (4) 7 (5) Hsa7 1 4 (3) 5 (3)
C1 2 6 (5) 9 (6) Hsa8 2 2 3
C2 2 3 4 (3) Hsa9 1 3 4
D1 1 1 4 Hsa10 1 4 (2) 6 (2)
D2 1 3 (1) 6 (2) Hsa11 1 1 4
D3 3 6 (3) 7 (3) Hsa12 1 4 (2) 6 (3)
D4 1 1 2 Hsa13 1 2 (1) 3 (2)
E1 1 1 4 Hsa14 1 3 4 (3)
E2 2 4 (2) 4 (3) Hsa15 1 5 (2) 6 (2)
E3 1 4 (2) 4 (2) Hsa16 2 3 (2) 3 (2)
F1 1 1 2 Hsa17 1 1 4
F2 1 1 1 Hsa18 1 2 (1) 2 (1)
X 1 1 1 Hsa19 0 4 (2) 5 (3)
Y 0 1 3 (2) Hsa20 1 1 1
Hsa21 1 1 1
 Total 32 63 (44) 100 (68) Hsa22 2 3 3
HsaX 1 1 1
HsaY 0 1 3 (2)
 Total 30 64 (45) 102 (70)
  • Numbers indicate direct counts of chromosome comparisons of feline chromosomes to human chromosomes considering homologous Type I gene locations and order in each species (see Methods). (CSU) Conserved segments unordered; (CSO) conserved segments ordered. In parentheses, CSUs and CSOs containing ≥2 mapped homologous loci.

This Article

  1. Genome Res. 10: 691-702

Preprint Server