Table 2.
Comparison of Chargaff Differences of Six Segments ofM. jannaschii
| Genome segment | Chargaff difference (%) | Base composition of average 1-kb window | Purine-loading index | ||||||||||||
| no. | (C + G) % | number of windows | transcription orientation | leftward-transcribed | rightward-transcribed | ||||||||||
| leftward | rightward | leftward | rightward | A | C | G | T | A | C | G | T | ||||
| 1 | 32.1 | 1370 | 1169 | (A − T)/W | −10.66 ± 0.21 | 9.93 ± 0.28 | 303 | 203 | 118 | 376 | 373 | 124 | 197 | 306 | 298 |
| (C − G)/S | 26.48 ± 0.33 | −23.04 ± 0.40 | A − T = −73 | C − G = 85 | A − T = 67 | C − G = −73 | |||||||||
| 2 | 31.6 | 1416 | 1257 | (A − T)/W | −8.38 ± 0.22 | 8.46 ± 0.27 | 313 | 193 | 123 | 371 | 371 | 123 | 193 | 313 | 256 |
| (C − G)/S | 21.95 ± 0.43 | −22.37 ± 0.37 | A − T = −58 | C − G = 70 | A − T = 58 | C − G = −70 | |||||||||
| 3 | 31.7 | 1305 | 1324 | (A − T)/W | −9.92 ± 0.21 | 9.65 ± 0.20 | 308 | 197 | 120 | 375 | 374 | 121 | 196 | 309 | 284 |
| (C − G)/S | 24.45 ± 0.30 | −23.69 ± 0.35 | A − T = −67 | C − G = 77 | A − T = 65 | C − G = −75 | |||||||||
| 4 | 30.9 | 1248 | 1368 | (A − T)/W | −9.82 ± 0.23 | 10.40 ± 0.21 | 312 | 191 | 118 | 379 | 381 | 113 | 196 | 310 | 294 |
| (C − G)/S | 23.34 ± 0.35 | −26.64 ± 0.32 | A − T = −67 | C − G = 73 | A − T = 71 | C − G = −83 | |||||||||
| 5 | 31.5 | 1180 | 1361 | (A − T)/W | −8.80 ± 0.27 | 10.57 ± 0.20 | 312 | 195 | 120 | 373 | 379 | 123 | 192 | 306 | 278 |
| (C − G)/S | 23.98 ± 0.33 | −22.08 ± 0.35 | A − T = −61 | C − G = 75 | A − T = 73 | C − G = −69 | |||||||||
| 6 | 30.9 | 975 | 1723 | (A − T)/W | −11.48 ± 0.23 | 10.31 ± 0.18 | 306 | 192 | 117 | 385 | 381 | 114 | 195 | 310 | 306 |
| (C − G)/S | 24.23 ± 0.40 | −26.24 ± 0.30 | A − T = −79 | C − G = 75 | A − T = 71 | C − G = −81 | |||||||||
-
Details are as in Table 1.
-
↵The six segments correspond to bases 1–276500, 276501–553000; 553001–829500, 829501–1106000, 1106001–1382500, and 1382501–1664970.











