Table 2.
Results from the Spiking Experiment
| Marker (original pool vs. %) | Pvalues | |||
| ΔAIP | Peak heights not corrected | Peak heights corrected | Individual genotyping | |
| D4S431 | ||||
| vs. 5% | 0.83 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| vs. 10% | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.079 | 0.22 |
| vs. 15% | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| D4S230 | ||||
| vs. 5% | 0.93 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| vs. 10% | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.31 | 0.39 |
| vs. 15% | 0.13 | 0.58 | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| DRD5 | ||||
| vs. 5% | 1 | 1 | 0.65 | 0.95 |
| vs. 10% | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.15 | 0.32 |
| vs. 15% | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.036 | 0.026 |
| D4S1602 | ||||
| vs. 5% | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.91 |
| vs. 10% | 0.066 | 0.25 | 0.095 | 0.4 |
| vs. 15% | 0.01 | 0.012 | <0.001 | 0.039 |
| D4S2375 | ||||
| vs. 5% | 1 | 0.9 | — | 0.9 |
| vs. 10% | 0.92 | 0.57 | — | 0.7 |
| vs. 15% | 0.47 | 0.14 | — | 0.24 |
-
Presented are the values for statistical significance based on ΔAIP, from peak heights as produced by CLUMP (before and after correction), and from the true genotyping results. For each marker, three values correspond to 5%, 10%, and 15% enrichment of one individual's DNA. In bold are the significant results.D4S2375 did not require correction.
