Effect of ABCG2(2) on the breeding values of the daughters of the heterozygous sires and QTL effects derived from the animal model analyses
Quantitative traits | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Genotypea | Number of cows | Kg milk | Kg fat | Kg protein | % Fat | % Protein | ||||
| Class effectsb | -/- | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| +/- | 328 | -185 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.059 | 0.065 | |||||
| +/+ | 264 | -432**** | 4.2** | 3.3** | 0.169**** | 0.145**** | |||||
| % Dominancec | 14.3 | 80.9 | 27.3 | 30.2* | 17.2* | ||||||
| Regressiond | 670 | -226**** | 2.6** | 1.8** | 0.093**** | 0.076**** | |||||
| Animal modeld | -597 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.225 | 0.193 | ||||||
Significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
a 581S was denoted the “-” QTL allele; Y581 was denoted the “+” QTL allele
b Significance of the class effect is indicated in the +/+ row. Effects are computed relative to the -/- homozygote
c Relative to the -/- homozygote
d Allele substitution effects assuming additivity