Table 5.

Most Likely Positions and Effects of QTLs

Chromosome F-ratio thresholds[ii] 1%; 5%; 10% QTL position (cM)[iii] Trait F-ratio[iv] 1 vs. 0 QTL Additive effect Dominance effect % F2 Symbol[ix] Variance[vi]
a s.e. d s.e.
 16.6; 5.1; 4.335 (11; 97)MW (mg)6.10134−973.18
36 (25; 51)BW (g)10.441.30.30−0.940.495.36 Bw5
39 (10; 59)LW (mg)5.717422−3332.99
86 (65; 103)KW (mg)4.99116−2282.61
100 (80; 109)Leptin4.94−0.0360.0220.1030.0382.89
 27.2; 5.1; 4.326 (11; 39)KW (mg)7.59277−7123.93 Kwq6
88 (57; 100)IGF-I4.460.0130.0090.0410.0162.58
 37.4; 5.0; 4.228 (22; 35)Leptin5.47−0.0420.021−0.0780.0313.19 
29 (23; 37)AFP (%)6.17−0.0940.040−0.1500.0603.24 Afpq1
30 (23; 36)AFW (mg)4.23−3215−41222.27 Afw1
 47.0; 4.6; 3.833 (21; 52)LW (mg)7.69952789483.98 Lwq1
59 (34; 72)BW (g)5.340.880.33−0.850.482.81 Bw7
61 (49; 72)Insulin (pmol/l)7.1852.7614.116.420.94.19  Insq1
66 (58; 74)AFW (mg)7.61741917324.00 Afw2
66 (60; 72)AFP (%)5.720.1600.0470.0010.0773.01 Afpq2
66 (59; 72)Leptin6.390.0910.0260.0150.0433.71
 55.9; 4.6; 3.718 (0; 39)IGF-I4.280.0200.008−0.0180.0122.47
25 (0; 64)Leptin3.750.0580.025−0.0610.0392.21
80 (69; 91)AFW (mg)5.67541611233.01 Afw3
81 (73; 89)BW (g)11.691.450.300.250.425.96  Bw13
81 (77; 85)LW (mg)9.34772168304.79 Lwq2
 77.0; 5.1; 4.222 (13; 27)AFP (%)18.500.2490.043−0.1210.0639.11  Afpq9
23 (16; 28)AFW (mg)24.9311216−472412.02  Afw9
28 (23; 33)BW (g)25.912.340.33−0.940.5112.31  Bw14
28 (21; 35)KW (mg)14.50356−3107.25  Kwq7
29 (20; 34)MW (mg)19.49274−1179.55  Mwq1
32 (27; 44)LW (mg)28.7617323−503513.42  Lwq6
32 (23; 56)Insulin (pmol/l)6.2042.413.8−42.220.83.64
 96.8; 4.6; 3.827 (21; 35)LW (mg)9.41922354314.83  Lwq7
37 (22; 51)BW (g)6.231.280.36−0.180.563.27
105.9; 4.7; 3.838 (32; 45)IGF-I29.700.0560.007−0.0110.01014.98  Igf1q1
64 (47; 80)SW (mg)10.93−184065.50  Swq5
[vii]−859−1110
[viii]−2974212
117.9; 5.4; 4.64 (0; 12)Leptin5.080.0570.022−0.0580.0322.97
9 (0; 19)AFP (%)[v] 5.860.1160.043−0.1390.0643.08  Afpq5
[vii]0.0790.0540.0040.083
[viii]0.1460.069−0.3140.096
10 (0; 18)MW (mg)[v] 5.96114−1463.13  Mwq2
12 (2; 19)AFW (mg)[v] 6.484916−47233.42 Afw5
[vii]2721432
[viii]7427−11738
14 (6; 17)BW (g)[v] 7.521.060.31−0.810.433.92  Bw16
39 (23; 42)SW (mg)8.131441054.16 Swq1
55 (36; 65)BW (g)[v] 9.521.320.31−0.280.454.91 Bw4
59 (53; 69)AFP (%)[v] 4.260.0830.0400.1230.0592.26
59 (50; 65)MW (mg)[v] 11.50174−1365.86  Mwq3
61 (53; 71)AFW (mg)[v] 4.794116−44242.55
126.4; 4.3; 3.516 (8; 24)Leptin6.020.0580.020−0.0530.0293.50
17 (0; 50)BW (g)3.870.770.29−0.350.432.05 Bw9
18 (10; 26)AFP (%)7.480.1250.041−0.1400.0613.89  Afpq10
20 (14; 26)MW (mg)12.25194−966.23  Mwq4
21 (0; 30)SW (mg)8.90−1541364.52 Swq2
21 (15; 27)AFW (mg)[v] 8.565921−82304.50  Afw10
43 (26; 60)AFW (mg)[v] 4.37523111372.34
46 (31; 61)LW (mg)4.023324105422.12
135.7; 4.5; 3.810 (3; 16)BW (g)[v] 7.36−1.230.39−0.900.503.84  Bw15
10 (0; 21)MW (mg)[v] 4.42−1405−672.32
11 (4; 18)AFW (mg)6.03−3917−54223.20 Afw6
13 (0; 46)AFP (%)4.25−0.1050.046−0.1010.0652.25 Afpq4
13 (0; 21)Leptin4.320.0130.023−0.0980.0332.54
43 (33; 52)MW (mg)[v] 9.75266−985.00  Mwq5
47 (33; 61)BW (g)[v] 6.391.420.40−0.480.633.35 Bw10
146.6; 4.7; 3.93 (0; 13)SW (mg)4.6654−1552.43 Swq3
18 (6; 29)AFW (mg)5.58531612222.97
28 (21; 41)Leptin7.580.0610.0210.0750.0304.36  Lepq1
43 (16; 70)KW (mg)4.02166482.12
156.2; 4.5; 3.716 (0; 38)Insulin (pmol/l)3.9031.314.3−43.624.12.32
50 (33; 56)LW (mg)6.317722−27323.29 Lwq5
57 (49; 65)SW (mg)3.71104−651.94
56 (47; 65)IGF-I4.290.0190.007−0.0080.0092.48
176.5; 4.7; 3.836 (27; 51)AFP (%)8.92−0.2050.048−0.0070.0834.61  Afpq6
39 (30; 52)AFW (mg)9.00−77188304.70 Afw7
185.9; 3.9; 3.216 (0; 32)LW (mg)5.075321−53292.66
19 (0; 35)KW (mg)3.8396−2192.02
39 (26; 54)IGF-I9.510.0340.0080.0020.0135.34  Igf1q2
195.6; 3.6; 3.047 (32; 55)Leptin6.220.0790.022−0.0050.0323.61
X4.5; 3.0; 2.216 (0; 32)AFP (%)2.61 [vii]0.0530.0371.39
[viii]−0.0770.042
17 (0; 39)AFW (mg)4.78 [vii]43152.54  Afw11
[viii]−2317
44 (32; 58)LW (mg)5.85 [vii]−68203.02  Lwq8
[viii]−1822

[i] Trait acronyms are given below Table 3. For leptin and IFG-I, logarithmic transformed data were used for the analysis. Thus, the estimates are given as logarithmic units as well.

[ii] The chromosome specific 1%, 5%, and 10% F-value thresholds estimated via permutation analyses.

[iii] The most likely locations are given as distance from the centromere.

[iv] At loci in which QTL effects were sex specific (P < 0.05), below the joint estimate over both sexes estimates are given separately for males and females.

[v] F values for traits in which two QTLs were found in a linkage group (P < 0.05); the presented F values result from one QTL analysis after fitting the second QTL on the chromosome as the background genetic effect.

[vi] The QTL effects are given as reduction of the residual sum of squares fitting 1 vs. 0 QTLs.

[vii] Males.

[viii] Females.

[ix] Symbols were given for QTLs of the genome-wide 5% significant level at F > 7.07 for loci in which two QTLs were found in a linkage group at P < 0.05 and both single QTLs have chromosome-wide significant level at P < 0.05 and for suggestive QTLs, which have been confirmed from our previous experiment (Brockmann et al. 1998). Bold printed names indicate QTL symbols that have been assigned in this study.