Table 3.

Integrated Map Statistics by Chromosome

CFA Cytogenetic map no. of markers RH map no. of markers Linkage map no. of markers cyto/RH common markers RH/linkage common markers cyto/linkage common markers Integrated map(1) unique markers Gene(2) content ZOO-FISH(3) segments RH(4) segments
11267172151781443
21159173112711443
3114321311160533
4135111481621223
529371379261543
61536146102471033
7135315381691022
893712282461111
9305614784812622
1094116310251432
114451339149622
1234911271531311
13433715137522
14332824136811
1583511510237532
16723614130432
176404342411022
18174011472551112
19335726136222
20175313572691222
212498161511311
22347727147611
23423936126211
24927929133411
251123926134523
26732725336722
27445112101471411
28626626129611
29229826130211
30720523126411
31620623126312
32110413110010
33116413116311
34227222126211
35217211118211
362922218010
37422724126311
3838312110111
X120016014801
Y1401004101
Total assigned30213393501022515215862736765
No. of orphan  mrks0744000781700
Sub-total30214133541022515216642906765
Unlinked0870000913000
Total30215003541022515217553206765

[i] This table displays a summary of relevant data of the three maps composing the integrated map. The number of markers per dog chromosome is presented.

[ii] (1) Total number of unique markers reported (i.e., total of the three maps minus common mapped markers).

[iii] (2) The gene content column reports the number of genes mapped on the RH map.

[iv] (3) Human chromosome segments identified by Zoo-FISH data reported inBreen et al. (1999a). An additional four conserved regions were subsequently identified by Yang et al. (1999) and are denoted by ‘+1’ beside CFA 4,18,25 and 31.

[v] (4) Human orthologous segments identified from the RH map.