Table 2.

Pairwise Sequence Comparisons of Duplicated Sequences

Query Accession no. Locus Target Accession no. Locus Duplicon L m INDEL K D(Mya)
AC004527 21q11 AC004222 17q11NF1-A111846381105.70 ± 0.2413.0
AC002041 16p11HSU36341Xq28CTR-CDM261091119824.43 ± 0.1310.1
D87003/01822q11 AL022345 10q11KIAA018716372657594.14 ± 0.169.4
AC004527 21q11 AC000382 11chro112891199367.23 ± 0.5216.4
AC002041 16p11 L26963 14q32.3VH5062404.93 ± 1.0211.1
D87003/01822q11 AC004526 17q11NF1-B96898710.92 ± 1.1324.8
AC002042 16p11 AC004526 17q11NF1-C97699610.94 ± 1.1324.8

[i] The chromosomal location of both the target and query sequences are shown. Sequences were aligned using GAP optimal global alignment software. Alignments were analyzed using locally developed software (alignscorer) to determine the number of nucleotide sites compared (L), number of sequence mismatches (m) and the number of insertion/deletions (INDEL). The number of substitutions per nucleotide site and standard error were calculated using Kimura's-two step method (Kimura 1980). An evolutionary rate of nucleotide substitution for pseudogene sequences (2.2 × 10−9 substitutions per site per year) was used to approximate the evolutionary age of each duplication.