Table 2.

Statistical Significance of the Association of Short Repeats with Deletions and Tandem Duplications

LTR retrotransposon family Elements Deletions/duplications No. flanked by short DRs[i] No. of repeats in randomization test (Test 1) Bases in repeats Bases matching in 5′ and 3′ sequences No. of matching bases in randomization test (Test 2)
Mean ± SD (max.) P Mean ± SD (max.) P
(a) Deletions
Family 15660.18 ± 0.43 (3)3 × 10−11 40379.5 ± 2.5 (19)2 × 10−7
Family 25840.17 ± 0.38 (2)6 × 10−9 18184.8 ± 1.8 (10)4 × 10−4
Family 33359460.64 ± 0.79 (4)6 × 10−15 28125162.6 ± 6.9 (87)4 × 10−34
All three families4373560.85 ± 0.90 (5)3 × 10−14 33930676.6 ± 7.4 (101)2 × 10−41
(b) Tandem duplications
Family 36660.20 ± 0.44 (2)2 × 10−10 26256.2 ± 2.2 (15)8 × 10−5

[i] A repeat was considered as starting from the deletion or duplication breakpoint and was extended if the bases in the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences matched or (if there was a mismatching base) that mismatch was followed by at least 2 matching bases. The repeat was considered as stopping where a mismatch was followed by only 1 matching base.