Table 1.

Genetic Distance Estimates Among Representative Viral Strains from Type I, Type II, and PTLV-L

Type I
Atk Mto-te4
LTR env tax/rex LTR env tax/rex
Atk000
Mto-te424.912.48.9000
Ppa-7qB60.428.332.361.242.234.0
Efe-248.339.429.542.740.131.5
Nra48.040.928.738.740.829.5
MoT44.342.129.845.340.330.5
Pha-96946.644.929.863.645.030.8
Type II PTLV-L
Ppa-7qB Efe-2 Nra MoT Pha-696
LTR env tax/rex LTR env tax/rex LTR env tax/rex LTR env tax/rex LTR env tax/rex
Atk
Mto-te4
Ppa-7qB000
Efe-224.928.520.4000
Nra29.428.820.88.67.64.8000
MoT29.328.320.410.16.75.19.46.73.9000
Pha-96970.143.135.759.837.931.163.039.630.856.538.132.7000

[i] Models of substitution: Tamura–Nei (1993) (LTR: 858 bp),Kimura (1980) two-parameter (env: 1430 bp), andJukes–Cantor (1969) (tax/rex: 1001 bp).