Table 1.

Comparison of C. briggsae Chemoreceptor Genes with Their C. elegans Orthologs in thestrFamily

C. briggsae gene number[ii] C. elegans gene number Encoded amino acid identity (%) Exon DNA identity (%) Ks ± s.e. Ka ± s.e. Introns
G47M22.aF58G4.287771.90 ± 0.380.09 ± 0.016 shared
G47M22.bF58G4.787782.22 ± 0.610.09 ± 0.015 shared, G47M22.b

 lost intron h

G47M22.cF58G4.681752.74 ± 1.190.12 ± 0.017 shared
G47M22.dF58G4.58174NC0.13 ± 0.016 shared
G47M22.eC09H5.987781.42 ± 0.210.09 ± 0.015 shared
G47M22.f and  G47M22.gC09H5.8*68 and 7469 and 721.84 ± 0.340.18 ± 0.025 shared
G47M22.hM01D1.17269NC0.19 ± 0.026 shared, G47M22.h

 lost intron d

G47M22.ino ortholog
G47M22.jC09H5.68074NC0.12 ± 0.014 shared
G47M22.kC09H5.58573NC0.12 ± 0.022 shared
G45J08.aC06B3.958641.81 ± 0.360.33 ± 0.034 shared
G45J08.b*C06B3.1*61642.22 ± 0.750.30 ± 0.033 shared
G36C02.a*C31E10.1*5762NC0.34 ± 0.032 shared, G36C02.a

 lost introns

 g and h

[i] The carboxy-terminal exon region was excluded from most comparisons because it is unalignable in the str family.

[ii] (*) Certain or likely pseudogenes.

[iii] (NC) KsKaCalc cannot estimate.