Table 1.

Conserved Gene Strings in Pairwise Genome Comparisons

Genome 1 Genome 2 # conserved strings / # aligned genes / % in genome 1 / % in genome 2
Alignment method
All hits (information density) Bidirectional best hits (orthologs)
E < 0.1 E < 0.01 E < 0.1 E < 0.01
CtraCpneu33/745/83%/71%31/738/83%/70%35/757/85%/72%34/753/84%/72%
TpalBbur27/161/16%/19%27/161/16%/19%31/176/17%/21%31/176/17%/21%
EcoliHinf138/566/13%/33%80/411/10%/24%105/482/11%/28%105/482/11%/28%
EcoliBsub89/322/8%/8%36/182/4%/4%34/168/4%/4%34/168/4%/4%
BsubSynecho16/74/2%/2%9/58/1%/2%29/94/2%/3%9/50/1%/2%
SynechoAquae20/67/2%/4%14/53/2%/3%9/40/1%/3%9/40/1%/3%
AquaeTmar13/56/4%/3%7/41/3%/2%12/58/4%/3%12/58/4%/3%
TmarMtub30/129/7%/3%14/85/5%/2%46/150/8%/4%17/92/5%/2%
TmarDrad37/148/8%/5%27/125/7%/4%10/58/3%/2%10/58/3%/2%
EcoliMjan10/30/1%/2%5/18/0%/1%12/33/1%/2%5/19/0%/1%
EcoliAero54/191/4%/10%36/145/3%/8%25/56/1%/3%5/16/0%/1%
TmarMjan7/27/1%/2%4/19/1%/1%26/64/3%/4%7/30/2%/2%
TmarAero58/220/12%/12%46/196/11%/11%31/85/5%/5%12/47/3%/3%
MjanAero18/68/4%/4%17/66/4%/4%11/55/3%/3%11/55/3%/3%
MjanMthe41/184/11%/10%32/163/10%/9%28/148/9%/8%28/148/9%/8%
PyroAero29/122/6%/7%17/90/4%/5%11/60/3%/3%11/60/3%/3%