Table 1.

Verkko2 Hi-C versus trio benchmarking

SheepChickenHG002HG00733
T2T scf
 Hi-C31344041
 Trio23323233
T2T ctg
 Hi-C24212126
 Trio20252223
Hamming error
 Hi-C0.85%0.58%0.39%0.75%
 Trio0.88%0.60%0.39%0.77%
Switch error
 Hi-C0.95%0.13%0.41%0.79%
 Trio0.95%0.13%0.41%0.79%
QV
 Hi-C54.1745.1353.8753.86
 Trio54.1745.1753.8953.82
Missing genes
 Hi-C1.37%3.12%1.61%0.09%
 Trio1.36%2.52%1.60%0.09%
Missing genes (no sex chrs)
 Hi-C0.06%1.06%0.09%0.09%
 Trio0.06%0.44%0.09%0.09%
Dup genes
 Hi-C1.73%0.12%0.68%0.71%
 Trio1.72%0.22%0.69%0.72%

[i] T2T contigs/scaffolds were counted as those >5 Mb with telomeres on both ends. Scaffolds were broken into contigs at any stretch of more than three N's, and contigs/scaffolds <100 kb were discarded for all metrics. Verkko Hi-C shows comparable QV, switch, hamming, and missing gene stats to Verkko trio, but it consistently has a higher count of T2T scaffolds owing to its ability to restore missing connectivity using Hi-C links. Bold text indicates the best score for each metric and species; ties are also bolded.