[Related article:] Genome Research 32: 778–790 (2022)

In the above-mentioned article, the authors would like to correct errors related to Figures 5 and 6. Figure 6 was a duplication of Figure 5, and the variant positions within Figure 5 were incorrect due to an inconsistency in the residue numbering of the PDB:6XDS with its corresponding UniProt entry. This error was isolated to the 6XDS structure only, and did not qualitatively change the results or conclusions of the analysis. Both Figures 5 and 6 have been updated in the revised article online.

The authors apologize for any confusion this might have caused.

doi: 10.1101/gr.276900.122