Table 1.

Qualitative comparison of signature scoring methods based on their properties, influencing factors, and score comparability

Scoring methodDeterministicOptimal control gene selectionIndependent of total cell number and cell-type proportionsRobust to batch effect when scoring all samples togetherRobust when scoring for small signaturesRobust to unrelated genes in the signatureProvides comparable scores for multiple cell-type signatures
Adjusted Neighborhood Scoring (ANS)
SCANPY (Wolf et al. 2018): based on work by Tirosh et al. (2016)
Seurat (Satija et al. 2015): based on work by Tirosh et al. (2016)
Seurat_AG
Seurat_LVG
Jasmine_LH (Noureen et al. 2022)NA
Jasmine_OR (Noureen et al. 2022)NA
UCell (Andreatta and Carmona 2021)NA

[i] A check mark indicates a scoring method fulfills property or resists an influencing factor; a cross mark, the opposite. (Seurat_AG) Seurat scoring with all genes as control; (Seurat_LVG) Seurat scoring with least variable genes as control; (Jasmine_LH) JASMINE with likelihood computation; (Jasmine_OR) JASMINE with odds-ratio computation; (NA) a property or an influencing factor that cannot be evaluated for a scoring method. These results are discussed in detail in the Results section.