Table 3.

Comparison of Predicted and Actual Error Rates for Six Different Sequencing Projects

Project Quality score 4–12 13–22 23–32 33–42 43–51
Aaligned bases119,24675,29370,391144,87673,234
expected errors20,2562,064172371
actual errors16,7841,758127171
Baligned bases182,034137,940181,998399,690140,176
expected errors29,9533,7044101023
actual errors26,0382,536287350
Caligned bases139,345131,419151,197292,07068,529
expected errors22,2773,411357742
actual errors16,6701,513194263
Daligned bases103,89868,99568,613153,730111,752
expected errors16,8801,919168383
actual errors14,4951,924146592
Ealigned bases378,755217,438167,968392,717144,313
expected errors63,9476,336418954
actual errors55,9686,516355675
Faligned bases359,809136,68898,84064,0355,130
expected errors66,9384,079256230
actual errors57,9713,856332331
Allaligned bases1,283,087767,773739,0071,447,118543,134
expected errors220,25221,5131,78137013
actual errors187,92618,1031,44123712