Table 2.

Results on ONT data

Data setAssemblerSize (Mb)LG50LG90NG50 (Mb)NGA50 (Mb)Complete (%)Duplicated (%)QV# misasm structural# misasm local
CHM13GNNome29841127111.083.199.420.8333.5917581695
Raven2907164872.670.399.510.7034.041146952
Flye2851176070.069.599.500.6933.91134123
Shasta2884177259.756.399.500.5537.3057190
A. thalianaGNNome1314914.614.599.831.0726.54242221
Raven12551114.514.599.811.0727.2895185
Flye12451513.713.799.791.0726.03716
Shasta115512.112.199.810.9425.8416256

[i] The best-achieved results are in bold. The assemblies of GNNome and Raven were additionally polished with Racon (Vaser et al. 2017). Flye and Shasta have built-in polishing modules, so we did not perform additional postassembly polishing. Shasta did not assemble 90% of the A. thaliana genome, hence the LG90 is undefined. Full QUAST report for ONT data is given in Supplemental Table S2.