Comparison Between CDS From GSLT-Deduced and Annotated Gene Models
Annotated gene models with a CDS reduction | Annotated genes with no CDS reduction | Annotated genes Identical to GSLT models | Annotated genes with internal modifications proposed by GSLT models | Annotated genes with a proposed extension | Annotated genes with extension including additional exons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 388 | 4904 | 142 | 178 | 107 | |
| 5558 | (7%) | 5170 | (94.9%) | (2.7%) | (3.4%) | (2.1%) |
| Group B | 306 | 890 | 298 | 425 | 272 | |
| 1931 | (15.8%) | 1625 | (54.8%) | (18.3%) | (26.1%) | (16.7%) |
[i] The sum is over 100%, as an annotated gene can belong to more than one category.