RT Journal A1 Sirak, Kendra A1 Fernandes, Daniel A1 Cheronet, Olivia A1 Harney, Eadaoin A1 Mah, Matthew A1 Mallick, Swapan A1 Rohland, Nadin A1 Adamski, Nicole A1 Broomandkhoshbacht, Nasreen A1 Callan, Kimberly A1 Candilio, Francesca A1 Lawson, Ann Marie A1 Mandl, Kirsten A1 Oppenheimer, Jonas A1 Stewardson, Kristin A1 Zalzala, Fatma A1 Anders, Alexandra A1 Bartík, Juraj A1 Coppa, Alfredo A1 Dashtseveg, Tumen A1 Évinger, Sándor A1 Farkaš, Zdeněk A1 Hajdu, Tamás A1 Bayarsaikhan, Jamsranjav A1 McIntyre, Lauren A1 Moiseyev, Vyacheslav A1 Okumura, Mercedes A1 Pap, Ildikó A1 Pietrusewsky, Michael A1 Raczky, Pál A1 Šefčáková, Alena A1 Soficaru, Andrei A1 Szeniczey, Tamás A1 Szőke, Béla Miklós A1 Van Gerven, Dennis A1 Vasilyev, Sergey A1 Bell, Lynne A1 Reich, David A1 Pinhasi, Ron T1 Human auditory ossicles as an alternative optimal source of ancient DNA JF Genome Research JO Genome Research YR 2020 FD March 01 VO 30 IS 3 SP 427 OP 436 DO 10.1101/gr.260141.119 UL http://genome.cshlp.org/content/30/3/427.abstract AB DNA recovery from ancient human remains has revolutionized our ability to reconstruct the genetic landscape of the past. Ancient DNA research has benefited from the identification of skeletal elements, such as the cochlear part of the osseous inner ear, that provides optimal contexts for DNA preservation; however, the rich genetic information obtained from the cochlea must be counterbalanced against the loss of morphological information caused by its sampling. Motivated by similarities in developmental processes and histological properties between the cochlea and auditory ossicles, we evaluate the ossicles as an alternative source of ancient DNA. We show that ossicles perform comparably to the cochlea in terms of DNA recovery, finding no substantial reduction in data quantity and minimal differences in data quality across preservation conditions. Ossicles can be sampled from intact skulls or disarticulated petrous bones without damage to surrounding bone, and we argue that they should be used when available to reduce damage to human remains. Our results identify another optimal skeletal element for ancient DNA analysis and add to a growing toolkit of sampling methods that help to better preserve skeletal remains for future research while maximizing the likelihood that ancient DNA analysis will produce useable results.