RT Journal A1 Landt, Stephen G. A1 Marinov, Georgi K. A1 Kundaje, Anshul A1 Kheradpour, Pouya A1 Pauli, Florencia A1 Batzoglou, Serafim A1 Bernstein, Bradley E. A1 Bickel, Peter A1 Brown, James B. A1 Cayting, Philip A1 Chen, Yiwen A1 DeSalvo, Gilberto A1 Epstein, Charles A1 Fisher-Aylor, Katherine I. A1 Euskirchen, Ghia A1 Gerstein, Mark A1 Gertz, Jason A1 Hartemink, Alexander J. A1 Hoffman, Michael M. A1 Iyer, Vishwanath R. A1 Jung, Youngsook L. A1 Karmakar, Subhradip A1 Kellis, Manolis A1 Kharchenko, Peter V. A1 Li, Qunhua A1 Liu, Tao A1 Liu, X. Shirley A1 Ma, Lijia A1 Milosavljevic, Aleksandar A1 Myers, Richard M. A1 Park, Peter J. A1 Pazin, Michael J. A1 Perry, Marc D. A1 Raha, Debasish A1 Reddy, Timothy E. A1 Rozowsky, Joel A1 Shoresh, Noam A1 Sidow, Arend A1 Slattery, Matthew A1 Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. A1 Tolstorukov, Michael Y. A1 White, Kevin P. A1 Xi, Simon A1 Farnham, Peggy J. A1 Lieb, Jason D. A1 Wold, Barbara J. A1 Snyder, Michael T1 ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia JF Genome Research JO Genome Research YR 2012 FD September 01 VO 22 IS 9 SP 1813 OP 1831 DO 10.1101/gr.136184.111 UL http://genome.cshlp.org/content/22/9/1813.abstract AB Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become a valuable and widely used approach for mapping the genomic location of transcription-factor binding and histone modifications in living cells. Despite its widespread use, there are considerable differences in how these experiments are conducted, how the results are scored and evaluated for quality, and how the data and metadata are archived for public use. These practices affect the quality and utility of any global ChIP experiment. Through our experience in performing ChIP-seq experiments, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed a set of working standards and guidelines for ChIP experiments that are updated routinely. The current guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data and metadata reporting, and data quality assessment. We discuss how ChIP quality, assessed in these ways, affects different uses of ChIP-seq data. All data sets used in the analysis have been deposited for public viewing and downloading at the ENCODE (http://encodeproject.org/ENCODE/) and modENCODE (http://www.modencode.org/) portals.