RT Journal A1 Johnson, David S. A1 Li, Wei A1 Gordon, D. Benjamin A1 Bhattacharjee, Arindam A1 Curry, Bo A1 Ghosh, Jayati A1 Brizuela, Leonardo A1 Carroll, Jason S. A1 Brown, Myles A1 Flicek, Paul A1 Koch, Christoph M. A1 Dunham, Ian A1 Bieda, Mark A1 Xu, Xiaoqin A1 Farnham, Peggy J. A1 Kapranov, Philipp A1 Nix, David A. A1 Gingeras, Thomas R. A1 Zhang, Xinmin A1 Holster, Heather A1 Jiang, Nan A1 Green, Roland D. A1 Song, Jun S. A1 McCuine, Scott A. A1 Anton, Elizabeth A1 Nguyen, Loan A1 Trinklein, Nathan D. A1 Ye, Zhen A1 Ching, Keith A1 Hawkins, David A1 Ren, Bing A1 Scacheri, Peter C. A1 Rozowsky, Joel A1 Karpikov, Alexander A1 Euskirchen, Ghia A1 Weissman, Sherman A1 Gerstein, Mark A1 Snyder, Michael A1 Yang, Annie A1 Moqtaderi, Zarmik A1 Hirsch, Heather A1 Shulha, Hennady P. A1 Fu, Yutao A1 Weng, Zhiping A1 Struhl, Kevin A1 Myers, Richard M. A1 Lieb, Jason D. A1 Liu, X. Shirley T1 Systematic evaluation of variability in ChIP-chip experiments using predefined DNA targets JF Genome Research JO Genome Research YR 2008 FD March 01 VO 18 IS 3 SP 393 OP 403 DO 10.1101/gr.7080508 UL http://genome.cshlp.org/content/18/3/393.abstract AB The most widely used method for detecting genome-wide protein–DNA interactions is chromatin immunoprecipitation on tiling microarrays, commonly known as ChIP-chip. Here, we conducted the first objective analysis of tiling array platforms, amplification procedures, and signal detection algorithms in a simulated ChIP-chip experiment. Mixtures of human genomic DNA and “spike-ins” comprised of nearly 100 human sequences at various concentrations were hybridized to four tiling array platforms by eight independent groups. Blind to the number of spike-ins, their locations, and the range of concentrations, each group made predictions of the spike-in locations. We found that microarray platform choice is not the primary determinant of overall performance. In fact, variation in performance between labs, protocols, and algorithms within the same array platform was greater than the variation in performance between array platforms. However, each array platform had unique performance characteristics that varied with tiling resolution and the number of replicates, which have implications for cost versus detection power. Long oligonucleotide arrays were slightly more sensitive at detecting very low enrichment. On all platforms, simple sequence repeats and genome redundancy tended to result in false positives. LM-PCR and WGA, the most popular sample amplification techniques, reproduced relative enrichment levels with high fidelity. Performance among signal detection algorithms was heavily dependent on array platform. The spike-in DNA samples and the data presented here provide a stable benchmark against which future ChIP platforms, protocol improvements, and analysis methods can be evaluated.