|
| Table 3.
Molecular Phylogenetic Methods
|
|
Method
|
|
| Parsimony |
Possible
trees are compared and each is given a score that is a reflection of
the minimum number of character state changes (e.g., amino acid
substitutions) that would be required over evolutionary time to fit the
sequences into that tree. The optimal tree is considered to be the one
requiring the fewest changes (the most parsimonious tree).
|
| Distance |
The optimal tree is generated by first calculating the
estimated evolutionary distance between all pairs of sequences. Then
these distances are used to generate a tree in which the branch
patterns and lengths best represent the distance matrix.
|
| Maximum
likelihood
|
Maximum likelihood is similar to parsimony methods in
that possible trees are compared and given a score. The score is based
on how likely the given sequences are to have evolved in a particular
tree given a model of amino acid or nucleotide substitution
probabilities. The optimal tree is considered to be the one that has
the highest probability.
|
| Bootstrapping |
Alignment positions
within the original multiple sequence alignment are resampled and new
data sets are made. Each bootstrapped data set is used to generate a
separate phylogenetic tree and the trees are compared. Each node of the
tree can be given a bootstrap percentage indicating how frequently
those species joined by that node group together in different trees.
Bootstrap percentage does not correspond directly to a confidence
limit.
|