|
|
|
|
Genome Research
|
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In both yeast and mammalian systems, considerable progress has
been made toward the characterization of the transcription factors
required for transcription by RNA polymerase III. However, whereas in
yeast all of the RNA polymerase III subunits have been cloned,
relatively little is known about the enzyme itself in higher
eukaryotes. For example, no higher eukaryotic sequence corresponding to
the largest RNA polymerase III subunit is available. Here we describe
the isolation of cDNAs that encode the largest subunit of human RNA
polymerase III, as suggested by the observations that (1) antibodies
directed against the cloned protein immunoprecipitate an active enzyme
whose sensitivity to different concentrations of
-amanitin is that
expected for human RNA polymerase III; and (2) depletion of
transcription extracts with the same antibodies results in inhibition
of transcription from an RNA polymerase III, but not from an RNA
polymerase II, promoter. Sequence comparisons reveal that regions
conserved in the RNA polymerase I, II, and III largest subunits
characterized so far are also conserved in the human RNA polymerase III
sequence, and thus probably perform similar functions for the human RNA
polymerase III enzyme.
[The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank data library under accession no. AF021351.]
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In eukaryotes, transcription is carried out by
three major forms of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases, RNA polymerase I,
RNA polymerase II, and RNA polymerase III. Each is responsible for
transcription of particular sets of genes: Thus, RNA polymerase III
transcribes a number of small cellular genes including those encoding
the ribosomal 5S RNA, the tRNAs, the U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA), the
mitochondrial RNA processing (MRP)/Th RNA, which is involved in the
processing of the primer required for mitochondrial replication (Topper
and Clayton 1990
), the H1 RNA, a component of RNase P (Baer et al.
1989
), the hY RNAs, which are components of the Ro particles (Wolin and
Steitz 1983
), and the 7SK RNA (Murphy et al. 1986
), of unknown
function. This enzyme also transcribes several small viral genes such
as the adenovirus 2 (Ad2) VAI gene. None of the RNA polymerases can
recognize their target promoters directly but, instead, require
accessory transcription factors that bind to the promoters and mediate
polymerase recruitment. Considerable efforts have been directed toward
the characterization of the transcription factors required by the three
RNA polymerases. In addition, in yeast, the RNA polymerases themselves
are well characterized and cDNAs corresponding to the large majority of
their subunits have been isolated (for review, see Sentenac et al.
1992
; Thuriaux and Sentenac 1992
). Less is known, however, about the
mammalian enzymes, in particular RNA polymerase III.
In Escherichia coli, transcription is carried out by a single
RNA polymerase. The core enzyme consists of four subunits, the largest

subunit, the second largest
subunit, and two copies of
the
subunit. Together, these subunits form a tetrameric complex that requires the
factor for specific promoter recognition (for review, see Chamberlin 1994; Chan and Landick 1994
). As in E. coli, transcription in archaebacteria is carried out by a single RNA polymerase, but the enzyme is more complex and consists of more
subunits than the E. coli enzyme (for review, see Baumann et
al. 1995
). The eukaryotic RNA polymerases are multisubunit enzymes very
similar to the archaebacterial enzymes, containing 13-17 subunits in
yeast. The two largest RNA polymerase I, II, and III subunits have been
cloned from a number of organisms. For example, the largest subunits
from all three enzymes have been cloned from Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (Allison et al. 1985
; Memet et al. 1988a
) and
Trypanosoma brucei (Evers et al. 1989
; Smith et al. 1989b
). In
addition, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase III has been cloned
from Plasmodium falciparum (Li et al. 1991
) and Giardia
lamblia (Lanzendoerfer et al. 1992
), but unlike the largest subunit
of RNA polymerase II, for which the human (Wintzerith et al. 1992
),
Mus musculus (Ahearn et al. 1987
), Caenorhabditis elegans (Bird and Riddle 1989
), Drosophila melanogaster
(Jokerst et al. 1989
), and Arabidopsis thaliana (Dietrich et
al. 1990
) sequences are available, no RNA polymerase III largest
subunit sequence is available from a higher eukaryote.
Comparison of the available amino acid sequences reveals that the
largest and second largest subunits are very conserved among the three
eukaryotic RNA polymerases and that each is homologous to
polypeptides in archaebacteria: Thus, the first two-thirds of the
largest subunit are homologous to the A polypeptide and the last
third to the C polypeptide of the archebacterium
Halobacterium halobium, whereas the second largest
subunit is homologous to the B polypeptide of this organism (Leffers
et al. 1989
; Puhler et al. 1989
). Moreover, the largest and second
largest subunits are homologous to the 
and
subunits,
respectively, of the E. coli enzyme. The largest subunit
contains eight highly conserved regions, referred to as regions
a to h (Jokerst et al. 1989
; Sentenac et al. 1992
). Of
these, all are conserved in H. halobium A or C polypeptides,
and six (regions b, c, d, f, g, and h) are conserved in
the E. coli 
subunit (Allison et al. 1985
; Memet et
al. 1988b
; Jokerst et al. 1989
).
The roles of the various conserved regions are not yet fully
understood, but a number of mutational and cross-linking studies in
both the E. coli and the eukaryotic enzymes suggest that
several of the conserved regions in the two largest subunits of
RNA polymerase cooperate in the formation of a cleft containing the
active site of the enzyme, that is, the binding sites for the
incoming ribonucleoside triphosphates, the template, and the nascent
RNA (for review, see Sentenac et al. 1992
; Thuriaux and Sentenac
1992
). For example, the c region contains a weak similarity to
a region in both T7 DNA polymerase and E. coli DNA
polymerase I (Allison et al. 1985
), which in the E. coli DNA
polymerase is part of the DNA binding cleft (Ollis et al. 1985a
,b
).
This suggests that the c region in the RNA polymerases may
contact nucleic acids and thus be part of the active site. The
d region contains the motif (Y/F)NADFDGD(E/Q)M(N/A), which is
invariant in all multimeric RNA polymerases and constitutes the
Mg2+ binding site of the E. coli enzyme
(Zaychikov et al. 1996
). The f region is the site of all known
mutations that confer resistance to
-amanitin (Bartolomei and
Corden 1987
, 1995
; Chen et al. 1993
) a toxin that inhibits
transcription elongation (Cochet-Meilhac and Chambon 1974
; de Mercoyrol
et al. 1989
), and mutations in this region affect transcription
elongation (Coulter and Greenleaf 1985
; Thuillier et al. 1996
). In the
E. coli enzyme, the g region can be cross-linked to
the 3
end of the nascent RNA (Borukhov et al. 1991
).
Other conserved regions, such as the a region, may play a role
in the heteromultimeric assembly of the enzyme. This region contains a
zinc-binding domain with the consensus
CX2CX6-12CXGHXGX24-37CX2C. In yeast, mutants in the conserved residues of the consensus
zinc-binding domain of the RNA polymerase III largest subunit are not
viable, and conditional mutants of this region form an unstable enzyme lacking three RNA polymerase III-specific subunits, C82, C34, and C32
(Werner et al. 1992
).
As a first step toward the characterization of human RNA polymerase
III, we report the cloning of its largest subunit. We show that
antibodies directed against the cloned protein immunoprecipitate an
active enzyme with the
-amanitin sensitivity diagnostic of human RNA polymerase III. Furthermore, depletion of transcription extracts with these antibodies results in decreased transcription from
the RNA polymerase III VAI but not from the RNA polymerase II Ad2
major late promoter. Alignment of the sequence with the largest
subunits of yeast and trypanosome RNA polymerase III, the largest
subunits of RNA polymerases I and II from various organisms, the
H. halobium A and C polypeptides, and the E. coli 
subunit confirms that the largest subunit of RNA polymerases has remained highly conserved through evolution.
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of cDNAs Encoding the Largest Subunits of Human RNA Polymerase III
To isolate the largest subunit of human RNA polymerase III, we took advantage of the sequence conservation among the RNA polymerase III largest subunits of different species to design degenerate oligonucleotides for use in PCRs. From a combination of PCRs and cDNA library screens (see Methods for details), we isolated a cDNA containing an open reading frame (ORF) encoding the 1391 amino acid polypeptide shown in Figure 1, with a calculated molecular mass of 154.7 kD and a pI of 8.54. We refer to this polypeptide as hRPC155.
|
We compared the predicted amino acid sequence with that of the largest
RNA polymerase III subunit of yeast and trypanosome, the largest RNA
polymerase II subunit of man, mouse, fly, worm, yeast, and trypanosome,
the largest RNA polymerase I subunit of yeast and trypanosome, the A
and C polypeptides of the archaebacterium H. halobium, and the

subunit of E. coli with the program CLUSTAL W (v.
1.6) (Thompson et al. 1994
). As shown in the phylogenetic tree in
Figure 2, the sequence is most related to the RNA polymerase III
largest subunits of other species, with 50% and 40% identities to the
S. cerevisiae and T. brucei enzymes,
respectively. In contrast, the hRPC155 sequence is
only 32% identical with human RNA polymerase II and 22%-27%
identical with the available RNA polymerase I sequences. This is
consistent with hRPC155 corresponding to the largest subunit of human
RNA polymerase III. As noted previously (Memet et al. 1988a
), the RNA
polymerase II and III largest subunits are more closely related to each
other than to the RNA polymerase I largest subunit. In addition, the H. halobium A and C polypeptides are most closely related to the
eukaryotic largest subunits, with the RNA polymerase II largest
subunits being the most similar.
|
Recombinant hRPC155 Comigrates with the Largest Subunit of HeLa Cell RNA Polymerase III
The ORF shown in Figure 1 contains a homology to the a
region of other RNA polymerase largest subunits preceded by a
methionine, suggesting that it might encode the full-length hRPC155. To
verify this assumption, we raised rabbit polyclonal antibodies against
a peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of the predicted ORF (see
Fig. 1) and used this antibody (
-CSH499) in immunoblots. As shown
in Figure 3, the polypeptide translated in vitro from the isolated cDNA
(lane 3) comigrates with a polypeptide detected by the antibody in a
fraction enriched in RNA polymerase III (P11 fraction) (lane 2; see
also lane 1). This further suggests that the
predicted ORF corresponds to the full-length protein.
|
The anti-hRPC155 Antibody Immunoprecipitates an Active Enzyme with
a Sensitivity to
-amanitin Typical of Mammalian RNA Polymerase III
We determined whether the anti-hRPC155 antibody could recognize
the largest RNA polymerase III subunit as part of an active enzyme by
performing immunoprecipitations from two fractions enriched in RNA
polymerase III, an ammonium sulfate cut (data not shown) and a P11
fraction (see Methods), with both preimmune antibodies and anti-hRPC155
antibodies. Material bound to the antibodies was eluted with either the
specific peptide against which the antibody was raised or with a
nonspecific peptide, and the eluted material was tested in a
nonspecific transcription assay (Roeder 1974
) in the presence of
various concentrations of
-amanitin. As shown in Figure
4, no significant RNA polymerase activity was eluted
from the preimmune beads, or with the nonspecific peptide. However,
significant RNA polymerase activity was eluted from the anti-hRPC155
beads with the specific peptide, and this activity was resistant to
low, but not to intermediate, concentrations of
-amanitin. Thus,
an antibody directed against the carboxyl terminus of the cloned
polypeptide could precipitate an active RNA polymerase with the pattern
of resistance to various levels of
-amanitin typical of human RNA
polymerase III. This confirms that the polypeptide we cloned is the
largest subunit of RNA polymerase III and suggests that the carboxyl
terminus of this polypeptide is accessible to the antibody in the
active enzyme.
|
Depletion of Transcription Extracts with the Anti-hRPC155 Antibody Specifically Inhibits Transcription from an RNA Polymerase III Promoter
To determine whether the anti-hRPC155 antibody could recognize an enzyme involved in specific transcription from RNA polymerase III promoters, we depleted a transcription extract with either preimmune or anti-hRPC155 beads and tested in parallel transcription from the Ad2 VAI RNA polymerase III promoter and the Ad2 major late RNA polymerase II promoter. As shown in Figure 5, incubation of the extract with anti-hRPC155 beads had no greater effect on transcription from the Ad2 major late promoter than incubation with preimmune antibodies (cf. lanes 2 and 3, bottom). In contrast, however, incubation with the anti-hRPC155 beads but not the preimmune beads reduced VAI transcription, and this effect was blocked by preincubation of the antibodies with the specific peptide against which they were raised, but not by preincubation with a nonspecific peptide (lanes 2-5, top). There is, however, residual VAI transcription after anti-hRPC155 depletion, consistent with the observation that the depletion of RNA polymerase III was not quantitative as determined by immunoblot (data not shown). Nevertheless, these results indicate that the antibodies recognize, and are specific for, an enzyme that is active for specific transcription from RNA polymerase III promoters.
|
Sequence Conservation in Various RNA Polymerases
The isolation of the hRPC155 cDNA provides the opportunity to
compare a higher eukaryote RNA polymerase III largest subunit with the
already cloned RNA polymerase largest subunits and to determine how
well the previously observed sequence conservations hold. Figure 6 is a
schematic diagram showing the location of the conserved regions
a-h in hRPC155. Below the diagram we
indicate the percentage identity between hRPC155 and other eukaryotic
sequences, the E. coli 
sequence, and the H. halobium A and C sequences, in these regions. With the exception of
the b and h regions, where the human hRPC155 sequence is less related to the largest RNA polymerase III subunit of T. brucei than to RNA polymerase II largest subunits, regions
a-g are more related to the largest RNA polymerase III
subunit of species as distant as S. cerevisiae and T. brucei than to the largest human RNA polymerase II subunit. The
b region is in general approximately equally conserved among
the RNA polymerase II and III largest subunits, and the e
region, which is also the most conserved region, is approximately
equally conserved among the three eukaryotic RNA polymerase largest
subunits. The conservation between the a-h regions of
the eukaryotic largest subunits and the archaebacterial A and C
polypeptides is striking: Except for the e region, which is
only 25% identical to the e region of hRPC155, all regions are
at least 32% conserved. The E. coli sequence is less
conserved, with no significant homology to hRPC155 in the a and
e regions.
|
Figure 7 shows sequence alignments of the a-h regions
of eukaryotic largest subunits and the H. halobium A and C
polypeptides, and, where indicated, flanking sequences
(overlined). In
E. coli, a screen identified mutations in the conserved c, f, g, and h regions of the 
sequence, implicating all of these regions in transcription elongation and termination (Weilbaecher et al. 1994
). We have therefore also included the 
sequence in the alignments of these regions, as well as in the alignment of the d region.
|
The a, b, c, and d Regions
In the a region the consensus
CX2CX6-12 CXGHXGX24-37CX2C
zinc-binding domain (indicated by bold letters in the alignment) is
completely conserved in hRPC155, consistent with studies in yeast RNA
polymerase III, where mutations of the conserved residues in the
consensus sequence are lethal (Werner et al. 1992
). The b
region is quite conserved in all RNA polymerase II and III largest
subunits, but more divergent in the RNA polymerase I largest subunits
and the H. halobium A polypeptide.
In the c region alignment, we included the sequences from
E. coli DNA polymerase I and T7 DNA polymerase noted
previously as showing weak homology to RNA polymerases (Allison et al.
1985
). The residues that are similar or identical in the T7 and E. coli DNA polymerases and in the human RNA polymerase III largest
subunit are marked by a colon. The largest subunit of human RNA
polymerase III is as related to this region of the DNA polymerases as
the largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerases II and III (Allison et al.
1985
), with most of the similarities lying upstream of the helix-turn-helix motif, in the loop between
-sheet 7 and 8, in
-sheet 8, and in the loop separating
-sheet 8 and helix J, a region that lines the DNA-binding cleft of E. coli DNA
polymerase (Ollis et al. 1985a
). In the E. coli sequence, the
residues that are shaded and underlined correspond to residues that
were altered in the screen for mutations affecting E. coli RNA
polymerase transcription termination (Weilbaecher et al. 1994
). Those
located upstream or within the similarity to the DNA polymerases are
identical or similar in the human RNA polymerase III largest subunit
sequence. This is consistent with the proposed role of the c
region in contacting the DNA template and/or the RNA transcript.
In the alignment of the d region, we also show the E. coli 
region of similarity. This region contains the
(Y/F)NADFDGD(E/Q)M(N/A) motif, which has so far been found in all
multimeric RNA polymerases, including the archaebacterial enzymes
(Dieci et al. 1995
). Recently, the three aspartates in the
(Y/F)NADFDGD(E/Q)M(N/A) motif have been shown
to constitute the Mg2+ binding site of the E. coli enzyme (Zaychikov et al. 1996
). The motif is conserved in the
human RNA polymerase III largest subunit. The d region has been
mutagenized extensively in the yeast largest RNA polymerase III
subunit, leading to the isolation of a number of lethal single-site
substitutions and a few conditional mutants (Dieci et al. 1995
). The
positions of the lethal substitutions are shaded and underlined in the
S. cerevisiae sequence, and all of them are identical in the
human RNA polymerase III largest subunit sequence. Similarly, the
positions of conditional mutants in S. cerevisiae (overlined)
are identical in the human sequence with the exception of a R528 in the
yeast sequence to a K516 conservative change in the human sequence. The
conditional double substitution T506/N509 in yeast affects mainly
elongation rates but not transcription complex formation or initiation
(Dieci et al. 1995
). The conservation of the human sequence in this
region is consistent with the view that the d region is part of
the active site of the enzyme (Dieci et al. 1995
; Zaychikov et al.
1996
).
In the largest subunit of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II,
both the c and d regions have been implicated in start
site selection (Berroteran et al. 1994
). Thus, sua8
suppressors, which suppress an aberrant ATG translation initiation
codon in the leader region of the cyc1 gene by favoring
transcription initiation at downstream sites, alter A402 in the
c region and N445 in the d region (residues shaded and
underlined) of the S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II largest
subunit. Both positions are conserved in the human RNA polymerase III
sequence and in all eukaryotic and archaebacterial RNA polymerase
sequences (Fig. 6; data not shown). The phenotypes of the sua8
suppressors are very similar to the phenotypes of the sua7
suppressors, which encode altered forms of TFIIB, and the sua7
and sua8 mutations are synthetic lethal, suggesting an
interaction between TFIIB and RNA polymerase II, perhaps a direct
interaction between TFIIB and the RNA polymerase II largest subunit
(Berroteran et al. 1994
). Human TFIIB interacts directly with RNA
polymerase II in vitro through its two direct repeats (Ha et al. 1993
),
but the site of interaction in RNA polymerase II has not been
determined. However, the conservation of the sua8 positions in
all RNA polymerases would then suggest equivalent interactions of RNA
polymerases I and III with one of their transcription factors.
Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase III requires BRF, the
TFIIB-related factor (also
called TDS4, PCF4, and TFIIIB90), and both the yeast and human BRF are
quite similar to TFIIB in the two repeat regions (Buratowski and Zhou
1992
; Colbert and Hahn 1992
; López-De-León et al. 1992
;
Wang and Roeder 1995
; Mital et al. 1996
). Although BRF has been shown
to interact directly with the RNA polymerase III-specific C34 subunit
(Khoo et al. 1994
) and with a subcomplex consisting of the RNA
polymerase III C32, C34, and C82 subunits (Werner et al. 1993
), there
is no evidence so far of a direct contact with the largest RNA
polymerase III subunit. In addition, no counterpart of TFIIB and BRF
has yet been isolated for RNA polymerase I transcription. The
sua8 suppressors may thus affect the TFIIB-RNA polymerase II
interaction indirectly.
The e and f Regions
The e region is highly conserved in eukaryotic largest
subunits, but the conservation in H. Halobium is poor, and we therefore show the H. halobium sequence below the alignment of the eukaryotic sequences. The f region and the region upstream are the sites of a number of mutations in different RNA polymerases from different organisms that affect transcription elongation. In the
E. coli 
subunit, mutations at the shaded and
underlined positions alter transcription termination (Weilbaecher et
al. 1994
). Most of these positions are identical in the human RNA polymerase III largest subunit. In the yeast RNA polymerase III largest
subunit, the shaded and underlined residues indicate the positions of
lethal or conditional (in lowercase letters) single, double, or triple
substitutions (Thuillier et al. 1996
). The double conditional mutant
D829/R830 has been shown to affect transcription elongation but not
transcription complex assembly nor formation of the first
phosphodiester bond (Thuillier et al. 1996
). Within the f
region, most of the positions are identical in the human RNA polymerase
III largest subunit sequence. The conservation is less good upstream of
the f region. In particular, a putative RNA polymerase
III-specific motif (Smith et al. 1989a
), indicated by bold letters
upstream of region f, is not any more conserved among the RNA
polymerase III sequences than among all RNA polymerase sequences. This
region is more an RNA polymerase II-specific motif, with the second
position an asparagine in all RNA polymerase II sequences.
A number of mutations that render RNA polymerase II more resistant to
-amanitin have been mapped to the f region in M. musculus (Bartolomei and Corden 1987
, 1995
), D. melanogaster (Chen et al. 1993
), and C. elegans (in Chen
et al. 1993
). In D. melanogaster, one of these mutations (C4
mutation R741H) has been shown to alter the transcription elongation
properties of the enzyme in vitro (Coulter and Greenleaf 1985
). The
positions of all these mutations are shaded and underlined in the
corresponding sequences. Most of these positions are also conserved in
the human RNA polymerase III largest subunit sequence, suggesting that
they are part of an
-amanitin binding pocket but do not confer the differential sensitivities to
-amanitin of the different RNA polymerases. However, there is one striking exception. N792 in the
mouse sequence (bold, shaded, and underlined) is conserved in the RNA
polymerase II enzymes except for the yeast enzyme (Bartolomei and
Corden 1995
), which is 100-fold more resistant to
-amanitin than
the vertebrate enzyme (see Schultz and Hall 1976
) and is not conserved
in any of the
-amanitin-resistant enzymes including human RNA
polymerase III. Thus, an N at this position may contribute to the
formation of a high affinity binding site for
-amanitin and
therefore result in high sensitivity to the toxin.
The g and h Regions
Like regions c and d, regions g and
h have been implicated in both transcription initiation and elongation. The g region is implicated in transcription initiation because it is the site of two mutations in S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II, T1080I and S1096F, that result in
slightly altered start sites at the HIS4 promoter (Hekmatpanah
and Young 1991
), whereas the h region contains the site mutated
(position G1388, shaded and underlined) in a sua8 suppressor
(Berroteran et al. 1994
). One of the two residues mutated in the
g region (T1080) is conserved in all RNA polymerases, and like
the sua8 suppressors in the c and d regions
(see above), the position of the sua8 suppressor in the
h region is conserved in all RNA polymerases aligned. This
suggests that these regions play a general, rather than an RNA
polymerase II-specific, role in transcription initiation. Both the
g and h regions are the sites of mutations in the

subunit of the E. coli enzyme (shaded and
underlined) that alter transcription termination (Weilbaecher et al.
1994
), and several of these positions are conserved. Most strikingly,
region g contains a stretch of seven highly conserved amino
acids (indicated in boldface type), which is part of a larger region of
the 
subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase that could be
cross-linked to the 3
end of nascent RNA (Borukhov et al. 1991
).
The high conservation of this stretch suggests that it performs the
same function in all enzymes, including the human RNA polymerase III
enzyme.
These studies show that the largest subunit of human RNA polymerase III
is highly related to the largest subunit of RNA polymerase III from
other species and, to a lesser extent, to the largest subunit of RNA
polymerases II and I. It is striking, however, that the greater degree
of conservation among RNA polymerase III largest subunits cannot be
attributed to clusters of conserved residues. With the possible
exception of the small cluster of amino acids at the end of region
d K/RXGEPI/LI/LA, which may form an RNA polymerase III-specific
motif, the greater sequence conservation among the RNA polymerase III
largest subunit sequences reflects isolated identities. This suggests
that the specific recruitment of RNA polymerase I, II, or III to its
various target promoters will involve either subunits that are unique
to each RNA polymerase (Werner et al. 1993
; Khoo et al. 1994
), or
subtle differences in protein-protein interactions involving isolated amino acid differences.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of cDNA Clones Encoding the Largest Subunit of RNA Polymerase III
The largest RNA polymerase III subunit has been cloned from four
organisms: The protozoans P. falciparum (Li et al. 1991
), G. lamblia (Lanzendoerfer et al. 1992
), and T. brucei
(Smith et al. 1989a
) and the yeast S. cerevisiae (Allison et
al. 1985
). Alignment of the four predicted amino acid sequences showed
two highly conserved stretches in the f and g regions. We first designed two nested forward primers corresponding to the
sequences AQSVGEP and GEPSTQMT, respectively, and a reverse primer
corresponding to the sequence AGVASM, at both ends of the conserved
stretch in region g of the T. brucei sequence. In the
first round of PCR, we used a 5
end-labeled outside forward primer
together with the reverse primer. The products of the PCR were
fractionated on a sequencing gel, the region of the gel corresponding to the expected size product was excised, and the nucleic acids were
eluted and used as a template for a second PCR reaction with the
internal forward primer and the same reverse primer as in the first PCR
reaction. The products were fractionated on a 20% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel and stained with ethidium bromide. We obtained a
clearly visible band of the expected size, which was subcloned and
sequenced. The sequence did not correspond to the already cloned
largest subunit of human RNA polymerase II (Wintzerith et al. 1992
) and
could thus correspond to the largest subunit of either RNA polymerase I
or RNA polymerase III. We used the sequence information thus obtained
to design two exact nested reverse primers. These were used in two
successive PCRs with two degenerate nested primers corresponding to the
sequences VDTAVKT and VKTAET, respectively, in region f of the
T. brucei sequence. We obtained a partial cDNA corresponding
to amino acids V863-F1055 in the sequence shown in Figure 1. We then
used this partial cDNA as a probe to screen a human
gt10 cDNA
library from NTera2D1 cells (Skowronski et al. 1988
) and obtained a
longer cDNA. A 300-bp probe corresponding to the amino terminus of the ORF encoded by this cDNA was then used for a second screening. The
procedure was repeated two more times to obtain a cDNA encoding amino
acids V185-T1391 in Figure 1.
To obtain sequences encoding the amino terminus of the protein, we
performed 5
RACE, as described (Frohman 1993
), from total HeLa
RNA, except that we used the enzyme SuperScript II RT (GIBCO BRL) for
the reverse transcription. We obtained a fragment encoding the missing
amino-terminal amino acids and an additional 20 bp upstream of the
putative start methionine. To confirm the sequence obtained by 5
RACE, we then performed a PCR with cDNA made from total HeLa RNA using
a forward primer corresponding to the 5
end of the DNA sequence in
combination with a reverse primer corresponding to the 3
end of
the RACE fragment. The sequence matched that obtained by RACE except at
position 84, where an A
G change in the DNA sequence led to an
arginine to a glycine change. The glycine is part of a highly conserved
zinc-binding motif. The sequence in Figure 1 corresponds to the
sequence obtained by PCR.
Generation of Antipeptide Antibodies
A peptide corresponding to the carboxyl terminus of the protein
(see Fig. 1) was synthesized, coupled to keyhole hemocyanin (KLH,
Pierce Molecular Biology Products) as described (Harlow and Lane 1988
),
and injected into rabbits to generate a polyclonal antipeptide antibody
(antibody
-CSH499, rabbit CS377).
Partial Purification of Human RNA Polymerase III
To follow RNA polymerase III activity during purification, we
used a modification of the nonspecific transcription assay described previously (Roeder 1974
). An amount of 31 µl of a buffer containing 60 mM Tris/HCl, (pH 7.9), 2 mM MnCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM GTP, CTP, and ATP, 0.05 mM UTP, 1 µCi [5,6-3H]UTP (44 Ci/mmole,
Amersham), 2.5 µg of poly [d(A-T)], and 16 mM
AmSO4 was added to 20 µl of fraction in buffer D (20 mM HEPES/KOH at pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 20% glycerol,
0.2 mM EDTA) containing 3 mM DTT. To distinguish
between RNA polymerase I, II, and III activity, the reactions were
supplemented with either no, 2 µg/ml, or 300 µg/ml of
-amanitin. The reactions were then incubated for 20 min at 30°C
after which they were pipetted onto DEAE-cellulose disks (Whatman
DE81). The disks were then washed five times in 0.5 M
Na2HPO4, twice in H2O, and twice in 100%
EtOH. The incorporation of [5,6-3H]UTP into the nascent RNA
was then measured by scintillation counting.
To obtain fractions enriched in RNA polymerase III, 850 ml of HeLa S100
extract (Dignam et al. 1983
) (12 mg/ml, 10.2 grams of protein) was used
as starting material for sequential ammonium sulfate precipitations.
The 30%-40% ammonium sulfate precipitate, which contained RNA
polymerase III, was redissolved in 300 ml of buffer D supplemented with
3 mM DTT and 0.1 mM PMSF and dialyzed against the
same buffer. An amount of 100 ml of the ammonium sulfate cut (1950 mg
of protein) was then loaded onto a 174-ml P11 column (11-12 mg of
protein/ml of packed resin) equilibrated in buffer D containing 3 mM DTT and 0.5 mM PMSF. Material was eluted with a
four column volume linear gradient from 0.1 to 1 M KCl in
buffer D at a flow rate of 0.7 column volume/hr. RNA polymerase III
eluted between 0.5 and 0.6 M KCl. The fractions containing
the peak of RNA polymerase III activity were pooled (90 ml, 129 mg of
protein), dialyzed against buffer D containing 3 mM DTT and
0.5 mM PMSF, and used for the immunoprecipitations and
immunoblot analyses. Protein concentrations were measured by the
Bradford assay.
Immunoblots
The full-length ORF of the human RNA polymerase III largest
subunit (designated hRPC155) was cloned into a modified pCITE vector
(pCITE M1) with standard cloning techniques to generate the construct
pCITE-hRPC155. One microgram of plasmid was used as template for
coupled in vitro transcription-translation assays (TNT, Promega) in a
final volume of 50 µl containing 4 µl of
L-[35S] methionine. Five microliters of
pCITE-hRPC155-programmed lysate, 5 µl of unprogrammed, 10 µl
of P11 fraction, and a mixture of 10 µl of P11 and 5 µl of
programmed lysate were loaded on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The
gel was then blotted onto nitrocellulose (Whatman), and the membrane
was probed with rabbit
-CSH499 antibodies at a 1:1000
dilution. The signals were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL,
Amersham). After extinction of the chemiluminescent signal, the
membrane was re-exposed to X-ray film for 8 hr to visualize the
L-[35S]methionine-labeled, in vitro-translated
proteins.
Immunoprecipitation of Active RNA Polymerase III
Rabbit preimmune and
-CSH499 antibodies were chemically
cross-linked to protein A-Sepharose beads as described (Harlow and Lane
1988
). One hundred microliters of beads was incubated for 30 min at
4°C with 1 ml of RNA polymerase III-enriched P11 fraction. The beads
were then washed three times with 1 ml of buffer D containing 0.1%
Tween 20, 1 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF. The enzyme was
then eluted off the beads by incubation of the beads in 100 µl of
buffer D containing 1 µg/µl of either specific (CSH499) or
nonspecific (CSH498) peptide. The beads were then pelleted, and 20 µl of the supernatant was used in the nonspecific transcription
assay described above.
In Vitro Transcription
Forty microliters of whole cell extract (Maroney et al. 1990
) was
incubated with an equal volume of preimmune or
-CSH499 beads.
Where indicated, the incubations were performed in the presence of 4 µg of the specific blocking peptide (CSH499) or of a nonspecific
peptide (CSH498). Four microliters of untreated or treated extract was
then programmed with either 0.25 µg of the plasmid pBSM13+VAI
(Lobo et al. 1992
) containing the Ad2 VAI gene, or 0.5 µg of the
plasmid p119ML(CA2) (Lobo et al. 1992
) containing the Ad2 major late
promoter in front of a G-less cassette. The reactions were performed in
a total volume of 20 or 30 µl, respectively, under the conditions
described (Lobo et al. 1992
).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank B. Ma for help with the sequencing of hRPC155, S. Teplin for synthesis of oligonucleotides, J.P.J. Chong for help with the sequence alignments and discussion, and R.W. Henry for helpful discussions during the entire course of this work. We also thank J.P.J. Chong and R.W. Henry for comments on the manuscript, and M. Ockler, J. Duffy, and P. Renna for artwork and photography. This work was funded in part by National Institutes of Health grant R01GM38810.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL hernande{at}cshl.org; FAX (516) 367-6081.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-amanitin resistance mutation in the gene encoding the largest subunit of mouse RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:
586-594
-amanitin resistance mutations in mouse.
Mol. & Gen. Genet.
246:
778-782[CrossRef][Medline].
terminus in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:
23932-23935
-amanitin of single step addition reactions and productive RNA synthesis catalysed by wheat germ RNA polymerase II.
Biochem. J.
258:
165-169[Medline].
subunit.
Nucleic Acids Res.
10:
4035-4044
-Amanitin sensitivity and other properties which distinguish between RNA polymerases I and III.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
73:
1029-1033