This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: gr.6927808v1 18/1/60    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Watkins-Chow, D. E. Articles by Pavan, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Watkins-Chow, D. E. Articles by Pavan, W. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Genomic copy number and expression variation within the C57BL/6J inbred mouse strain

Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

The C57BL/6J strain is one of the most widely used animal models for biomedical research, and individual mice within the strain are often assumed to be genetically identical after more than 70 yr of inbreeding. Using a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping panel, we assessed if copy number variations (CNVs) could be detected within the C57BL/6J strain by comparing relative allele frequencies in first generation (F₁) progeny of C57BL/6J mice. Sequencing, quantitative PCR, breeding, and array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) together confirmed the presence of two CNVs. Both CNVs span genes encoded on chromosome 19, and quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that they result in altered expression of the insulin-degrading enzyme (Ide) and fibroblast growth factor binding protein 3 (Fgfbp3) genes. Analysis of 39 different C57BL/6J breeders revealed that 64% of mice from the Jackson Laboratory colony were heterozygous for the CNV spanning Ide. Homozygotes with and without the duplication were present in concordance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (13% and 23%, respectively), and analysis of archived samples from the C57BL/6J colony suggests that the duplication has rapidly reached a high frequency in the colony since 1994. The identification of two CNVs in the small portion of the genome screened demonstrates that individual mice of highly inbred strains are not isogenic and suggests other CNVs may be segregating within C57BL/6J as well as other carefully maintained inbred strains. These differences can influence interpretations of physiological, biomedical, and behavioral experiments and can be exploited to model CNVs apparent in the human genome.

E-mail bpavan{at}mail.nih.gov; fax (301) 402-2170.

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6927808

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?